Ted Baumhauer, Ed.D.TED'S BLOG | ||||||||||||||
|
He did a wonderful job entertaining the group. It struck me that
his performance was built around juggling but he never juggled more than three objects. To a non-juggler that probably isn't
important, but I am a juggler.
Jugglers can get caught up in putting large numbers of objects in the air and thinking that makes a good performance.
It's easy to fall into the mindset that doing more is better and that belief goes beyond juggling. Michael
juggled but more importantly he was funny, intelligent, and very entertaining. That's an important lesson!
It's not about doing more, it's about doing better at what is really important. For Michael it's about entertaining the audience it's
not about being the best juggler. What is important for you to be successful, however you describe successful?
Focus on those few really important things to be successful, instead of trying to do it all.
Put your focus on quality over quantity.
At the same meeting in Vegas, Teller did an excellent presentation on the Science of Magic. Given that he doesn't speak when he performs he had a lot to say!
In his presentation he showed us video clips of a floating ball routine that he performs
in his show with Penn Jilette at the Rio in Las Vegas. Teller than went on to explain, in detail, how the illusion was created. The premise of his lecture
was that knowing the secret behind the magic makes it's performance more beautiful. That is an unusual opinion for a magician but not for Penn & Teller.
In fact Teller pointed out that in the show Penn introduces the routine by saying "Here is a trick done with a piece of string."
In my book Little Blue Penguins I wrote about the difference between jugglers and magicians. In short magicians need to hide their skill while jugglers
want you to see theirs. Giving away the knowledge of how something is done is like a juggler and a good leader, in my opinion. Being like a magician, I said, and
hiding your skill and keeping your employees in the dark is not good leadership.
Tellers talk went right to the heart of the matter. The level of appreciation in watching someone at a high skill level, in any discipline, is
increased the more you understand about what they are doing. This reinforces that idea of a leader sharing their power. If they are truly
comfortatble with their skills then they have nothing to hide. The more their co-workers understand about what goes into their decision the better appreciation they
will have for the art of leadership. Penn & Teller give away magic "secrets" in their show, even though this runs counter to the culture of magic.
I think they've done alright and if you're a really good magician or leader, you will too. If you're not, get to work honing your skills!
If I have upset any magician with this, I apologize.
Why in the world do McCain and Obama want to be President of the United States? Who ever gets the job is going to inherit a mess with the economy in the
tank, global warming, the wars, the health care system and on and on. Who would want to take all that on? Hopefully a leader, a real leader, someone who can think
beyond himself and their own self interests. That's what real leaders do, it's in their nature. They don't lead because of prestige, or self interests they lead
because they have to, it's who they are.
The first time I became aware of this, as an adult, I was working in a steel mill in Warren, Ohio. Over the summer between my junior and senior year in college
I was lucky enough to work for CooperWeld Steel. Early on I heard some of the guys making fun of the foreman and that they made more then he did. Over time as I got
to know that foreman I began to appreciate that he could have stayed a mill worker but that he had a need to work with the group and not just be in the group. He needed
to be a leader. If that meant he took a cut in pay to be a foreman that was part of the deal. He was using his skills and talents and applying
himself to managing and improving his group. He was not just chasing the money and his own self interests.
Even though I don't remember the foreman's name I remember the lesson he taught me about leaders.
A couple of weeks ago I worked with a small group of manufacturing on the line trainers doing some interactive activities. The goal of this short
program was to have the group take a look at themselves and how they were accepting or rejecting new members. After three-hours with the group it was
pretty obvious that they were afraid. Alot of their joking around with each other served to set up a barrier to anyone not in their circle. A change was coming, they knew
it and they were circling the wagons to protect themselves.
Later I found out that they didn't really like my observations and questioned my opinion. In addition they wanted to know "who did I think I was?" All of this
was jusst another defense mechanism. All my observations were validated by the HR Director and she thought that in three-hours I had a pretty good handle
on what was happening in the group.
Okay, enough of that, here's the point. When someone gives you feedback, listen to it. They are not your enemy. They don't deserve, probably, to have their credentials,
or parentage questioned. They are actually doing you a favor. I'm not saying you have to believe it or act on their opinion. Just listen to it, take it in and
consider it. If we react in such a way that we drive them away they may never try to help us again. While it's nice to live in our own little world where we do
everything right, it probably isn't reality. I could have been totally wrong about that group, yet to summarily dismiss my observations and attempt to discredit the
messanger isn't the way to go.
"It's a rare person who wants to hear what they don't want to hear." Dick Cavet
It might be rare, but if we listen it will make us better people!
In Nancy Ortberg's book unleashing the POWER of rubber bands she briefly mentioned there was a difference between balance and
equilibrium. I've been thinking about that and she's right there is a difference. Managers strive to keep things in equilibrium while leaders
work to move the equilibrium from the lowest level of stability to a higher level while maintaining a balance.
Managers manage, they maintain. That implies they keep things they way they are. In a lot of organizations it is easy for people to adapt to the current situation and to get comfortable.
From my perspective that's what a manager would be good at, keeping people comfortable and managing the forces that are trying to pull the current situation out of
equilibruium.
Leaders are different in that they take themselves and us to a different place. That means that sometimes they have to make us uncomfortable and upset the
equilibrium to push it into a higher place. That's balancing! Balancing the status quo for what we can and need to become; the way we do things with the
way we need to start doing things; current infrastructure with new technology, methods, and attitutdes. Raising the standards is risky. It takes constant
attention and constant adjustments. To physically balance an object you keep your eye on the top while making adjustments on the bottom. That is what a leader
does! The leader keeps their focus on where they want to go while making adjustments in the present.
Balance and equilibrium are different! So are managing and leading.
LEAD ON!
All kinds of unnecssary pain should be avoided. It's unnecessary!
Necessary pain whether it is physical, mental, or emotional should be sought out. That's how we get better, learn something new, gain a new perspective. In short
it makes us better. Too often, and I'll admit this is just an impression, we try to avoid pain of the necessary variety. We avoid making a hard decision, we don't
work out enough, we don't push ourselves to learn something new. We avoid that pain thinking all pain is bad. It isn't! My guess is that the more you learn to
lean into the good for you pain the easier it gets. Just like the more you exercise the easier it gets.
Learn to lean into the good pain!
June 28, 2008WHAT YOU SAY?
A skill of leadership is creating perception. One way a leader, or anyone, can create a perception about themselves is the way they speak. Speak well and you convey confidence and intelligence, certainly positive leadership qualities. People are more likely to listen to what you say if you speak well. Speak poorly and your words are more likely to be dismissed and it will be more difficult for you convince others that you know what you are talking about. In the last couple of weeks I’ve began to notice some of my speaking habits. At first I noticed a habit of other people saying certain catch phrases over and over as they talked. Not just the normal “ums” and “ahs” that we all know about, but phrases. I heard several over the past couple of weeks including: “At the end of the day….” and “In the final analysis…” They began to slip into my speaking patterns. When I heard myself saying them as I was teaching a workshop I was concerned. Using these phrases too much becomes a crutch. I was concerned I was beginning to build what I was going to say around one of these phrases. That can’t be good. These catch phrases are just a more complex version of the “ums” and “ahs” and they begin to stand out and tell our audience something about us. Listen to an excellent speaker, you hear them cleanly and intelligently express their thoughts about the topic at hand. I doubt that you will hear them depending on catch phrases to convey their message. Do a self check. Are you using certain phrases a lot when you speak? Once you notice them they will be easier to work around. You’ve got to notice them first. June 2008Okay, it's been a while. Sorry I've been distracted by finishing the book. Little Blue Penquins: Tales for Making the Transition to Leadership. It
should be available in the next 3 to 4 weeks (July 2008). If you are interested in getting a copy email me at TedB@tedbaumhauer.com
and I'll give you a heads up when it has been officially released.
OFFERING TO HELP OR ASKING FOR HELP This past week I went to a workshop on networking. The instructor, Karen Galvin, did a great job. She used real actors to show us bad and then good networking. One of the points she made that stuck with me was looking for connection or similarities to begin building a relationship, looking for ways to help them. That got me thinking about offering and asking for help. In the leadership programs I teach I have often used the Samuel Clements quote: "If you want to make an enemy offer help, if you want to make a friend ask for help." This seems to be the opposite from what Karen was teaching. In thinking about it I've come around to that both have their place. The difference is in the relationship between the two parties. In a networking situation, hopefully, the parties will be on somewhat equal terms. During the first meeting both parties will want to be polite and put their best foot forward. In this case a gesture of good will in helping the other with a connection is a positive thing. In a leadership situation where there is a clear difference in power it is different. As a leader if you offer someone help you are, in essecence, saying they don't have the skills or knowledge to handle the situation and that you can rescue them. That puts them in the awkward situation of admitting they are not up to the task. That can be embarrasing and more than some would be willing to admit, especially if the relationship between leader and employee isn't that strong. Asking for help, while on the surface, may seem like a sign of weakness, may be a sign of confidence. It is a sign of confidence in yourself in that you feel strong enough to expose a weakness. Asking for help also shows you value the other person's opinion and skills. With a little practice a skilled leader can turn a situation arouind from running in to rescue an employee with an offer to help that may erode their confidence into a request for help that builds confidence. Offering help and asking for help play on the relationshop between those involved. We all want to be helpbul, but sometimes the best way to do that is to ask for help instead of offering it. November 2007Watch this video. I was stunned! It is about six minutes long but it give you a new perspective on the world we live in
and the world that's coming.
If accountability is not about being accountable to another person but instead to a set of standards or goals then everything can be done in the light of day. Setting those goals and standanrds can be done in the open. Measuring whether those standards are being met or not and to what level can be done in the light of day. This solar powered leading sheds light on the whole process from beginning to end. It would lead to real accountablity and avoid the traps of loyalty to a person and yield real teams that understand why decisions are being made. This understanding would lead to a greater commitment to work together. Motivation courses everywhere would cease to exist! Tap into the power of Solar Powered Leadership! Questions to ponder
October 2007
ORIGIN OF A COMMON WORD
Dried manure packaged in wooden boxes put into the leaky holds of those sailing ships
would get wet and re-hydrate. When that happened it would also create methane gas down
in those dark sealed holds.
Eventually a first sailor was told to go check the cargo. When that sailor put the lantern
down into the hold the open flame and methane created an explosion that would burn the ship
to the water line. When they figured this out the shipping companies began to re-label all
the boxes of dried manure with a special designation: Ship High In Transit. You can guess why
the myth about the origin of the word started.
Groups and organizations need to have the same concerns about creating an explosive situation.
The danger isn’t from methane gas but from all the unattended negative interactions between
employees. This includes rumors, grudges, miscommunications, lack of teamwork, and more.
If these issues are ignored they will fester and create an explosive environment in your group,
just like the manure creates methane gas.
The leader, or anyone else, has to be very careful about shedding light on the situation or
else they will set it off. It is far better to Ship High In Transit and keep all those
issues on the surface to begin with and not let them get a chance to fester.
RUBBER LIPPING
What this term means, in reference to Hearing people is that we can and do, sometimes, say things we don’t believe or intend to do.
It is a reminder to not just “listen” to the words but also watch the actions.
The same thing can be said about leaders. When we are in the leadership role people will constantly
judge what we say and what we do. If the words are not consistent with our actions we are “rubber lipping.”
Our reputation will develop based on that inconsistency. But if what we say and what we do match up, then we can be trusted to be true to our word.
Where are the words inconsistent with the actions in your department? Organization? your own leadership?
Ask for other people’s perspectives on this. Listen without reacting to whatever they tell you because what they tell you is a gift.
It is a gift that, if you use it, can make your organization more consistent and stronger because it will be more worthy of trust (trustworthy).
Becoming a LEADER! The transition to leading can be difficult.
It requires a new and different skill set. My focus is to help
individuals understand this transition, as well as learn and
practice the skills of exceptional leadership.
|